Friday, August 16, 2013

10 Lessons from Manny Pacquiao

I am sitting in a long, transatlantic flight and trying to convince myself it is not feasible in my current frame of mind to attempt writing this column after I arrive the destination. I expect that by the time we land, I’m likely to be tired, exhausted and seeking just food and sleep-trying to put some 1000 or so words on paper is likely to be the least of my priorities! I probably had reconciled myself to this pessimistic narrative when I took up the Time Magazine I was reading and read the very last page-“10 Questions” which in the edition of August 19, 2013 featured Manny Pacquiao the Filipino world champion boxer who has achieved fame, wealth and power through his exploits in the boxing ring. Emmanuel “Manny” Dapidran Pacquiao is a professional boxer from the Philippines who has won multiple world titles across weight divisions and was elected into his country’s House of Representatives in 2010. I was not expecting the interview with Pacquiao to reveal any profundity or intellectual context-he was a boxer after all who had grown up in his country’s slums but the very first answer to a question about how he managed to juggle fighting with being a congressman surprised me-“it’s just time management” he said sharply. Well that discussion of a management concept by the boxer/politician proved to be the first of many. By the time I finished reading the interview, I had found something fresh and reinvigorating to write about and I knew that in spite of my travels, I was going to be writing that column as soon as I settled into my hotel room! In total I extracted 10 “lessons” Pacquiao was teaching in that interview-5 which he stated explicitly like the time management example above, and another 5 which he alluded to implicitly. I propose to share my perspective on those lessons with readers. “It’s Just Time Management”: Manny Pacquiao as I have mentioned is a world champion boxer across weight categories and divisions. But he has also done some acting; music and he is a successful politician and congressman. In addition, he is a military reservist with the rank of Lt. Colonel. How does he combine all these, and excel at all of them? It’s “just” time management he says and provides an example-he considers the importance of matters on the legislative agenda vis-à-vis his boxing regimen in deciding how to apportion his time. I can relate to Manny of course-I write a newspaper column and produce and present a television show, both of them weekly and essentially hobbies. Yet my source of income is my consultancy business which I manage full time. For a long time, I also taught “full time” in a business school and I frequently honour media requests for interviews. And I sit on boards which require significant input in terms of time and quality. It’s about Passion: Pacquiao was asked why continue fighting despite all the successes, money and political power he had acquired? And his answer was right out of my “personal strategy book”-“that’s my passion” he responded! I frequently tell audiences who express interest in entrepreneurship that in my opinion the starting point is finding one’s passion and developing a business model out of it. If you don’t enjoy it such that you would do it for free, you probably won’t make a success of it as a business! “I always think positive”: The interviewer asked Pacquiao whether he would quit boxing if he lost his next fight with Brandon Rios and again his retort was sharp-“I’m not thinking negative-I always think positive”. He was completely unwilling to countenance the possibility of losing! There was no “plan B” to winning like the army that burnt the bridge behind them and therefore had no alternative to fighting to prevail. Leadership is about the People: The fourth direct Pacquiao lesson was in relation to his role as a politician and legislator. He was asked what mattered to him as a politician and Pacquiao’s response was “we passed a lot of bills that benefit the people of my constituency”. I wonder how many Nigerian Parliamentarians and for that matter, CEOs can truthfully say it’s all about the people! The Ultimate Strategist: I have written before about the role of the ultimate strategist, God Almighty in the affairs of men. I do believe that in the end, it’s not by power, might, intellect or strategy, but ultimately the grace of God. Apparently so does Manny Pacquiao. He says “I still believe in Jesus Christ, I still believe in God the Father” and wishes to be remembered as “serving honestly and with the fear of God”. And then there were the 5 implicit lessons. One, the importance of phasing or sequencing your priorities-he would fight for as long as he can, but once he announces retirement, that would be it. Two, competition and adversity is good for you! Pacquiao agrees he picked a tough opponent, Rios for his imminent fight and he really wishes to fight Floyd Mayweather, probably his ultimate test. Three, Pacquiao says in relation to his next fight both that it would be tough because Rios is not an “easy opponent” but also that “it’s going to be fun” stressing the importance of enjoying your work. Four, China, Asia and the New World is important going forward-that’s why the Rios fight will be in China. Finally, Focus! Asked whether he had ambitions for higher office, Manny Pacquiao says he is presently focused on being a successful boxer and congressman.

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

The Anambra Relocations

If initial reports were to be believed, agents of the Lagos State Government headed by Governor Babatunde Fashola, a lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, had gone on the streets of Lagos, seized 67 persons of Anambra State or Igbo origin on their way to their markets, homes or other legitimate activity, bundled them unto some trucks, driven fast and furiously towards Anambra State and dumped them somewhere at the foot of the Niger Bridge in Onitsha! When I read this report, I was initially shocked, then incredulous…and then I knew there was probably more to the report than it disclosed. Was there anything in Fashola’s record to indicate a disposition to act in such manner? I didn’t think so! Fashola’s commissioner for budget and planning, Ben Akabueze is from Anambra State; the head of the state’s infrastructure regulatory commission is also from that state; Fashola recently built a housing estate and named it after former Commonwealth Secretary-General, Chief Emeka Anyaoku, also from Anambra! Recently when popular actress, Ngozi Nwosu needed help to meet the cost of treatment of a kidney ailment, Fashola it was who came up with N4.5million, three quarters of the funds required. Lagos State employs many non-indigenes in its civil service, and its traffic management agency, LASTMA was headed by Young Arebamen, an indigene of Edo State. Minutes after I read the suspicious report and as I pondered these issues, I saw tweets on Twitter posted by a former local and international office holder of Igbo extraction condemning the actions attributed to Fashola. I cautioned her against jumping to conclusions and made up my mind to seek more information before making further comments. I also had personal reasons for concern on the matter, given the emotions I knew would be generated by the report-my sister-in-law, the wife of my most junior brother of same parents, hailed from Anambra State! And what did my direct enquiries from very senior officials of the Lagos State Government reveal? I was presented with oral and documentary evidence of the true state of facts-on April 9 2013, an official of the Lagos State Government (LASG) wrote to the Anambra State Government (ANSG) informing it of 14 persons who were in the state’s rehabilitation centre who “claimed to be indigenes of your state” and requested ANSG’s “urgent response to screen them to verify if they are truly from your state”. ANSG through its Lagos Liaison Office replied on April 15 acknowledging receipt of the LASG letter and requested “particulars of the 14 persons” in order to “facilitate their integration with their families if they are from Anambra”. LASG promptly wrote a second letter dated April 29 providing names, towns/villages, LGAs and state of origin of the 14 persons and stressing the need for ANSG’s officials to arrange a physical interaction with these people. We have since discovered that the governments of several other states-Anambra (!), Akwa Ibom and Rivers States as well as New York and Hawaii in the USA have implemented a similar policy. I also understand and agree that there was a political context to the behavior and hypocritical complaints of the Anambra State Government on this matter-a governor who has probably underperformed for most of his tenure, who now resorts to ethnic mobilization as the best route to ensure his party wins an imminent election! What surprised me however was why the majority of Igbo people were willing to accept this propaganda given as I mentioned earlier Fashola’s record on the subject? The emotional frenzy that accompanied the matter is also curious given a certain context-many years ago, Enugu State, the erstwhile capital of the old Eastern Region expelled government employees from other Igbo states; more recently Abia State sacked all civil servants from neighbouring states, most of whom were from Imo; as we speak, the government of Ebonyi State refuses to allow an Anambra indigene acquire control of a cement company situated in Ebonyi; and the controversy over the Mbaise people of Imo State’s vehement rejection of a Catholic Bishop from Anambra rages on!!! Clearly there were other factors that accounted for the outrage over the actions of the Lagos State Government, which were not reflected in these other more egregious instances! I was also surprised that in spite of information that the policy of the Lagos State Government on resettlement of destitute and vagrant persons with their families and communities had been implemented in respect of persons from Oyo, Ogun and Osun, and in several Northern States, the anger in several commentators refused to abate. One caller on a radio phone-in programme in fact argued that Lagos State should have put the people in prison rather than repatriate them towards their communities. And then I realized that the argument was not really about the welfare of the persons concerned! If it was about their welfare, ANSG would have gone to visit and help its indigenes, rather than play politics with their fate! If the focus was their welfare, it would be clear to all that when you rehabilitate homeless, mentally-retarded, drug-addicted, and penniless people, you don’t release them to go back on the streets; you send them to areas where they would have a family or community support system, and in their circumstances, the best places for these destitute persons was back in their villages! And then I realized that for some, the argument was really a proxy for another argument over the ownership of Lagos-that Lagos was a “no-man’s land” and that Igbos were the greatest contributors to the development of Lagos. That is a debate I’m not prepared to take part in except to caution that the other city in which such an argument is ongoing is Jos!